Sunday, May 2, 2010

Image Versus Quality: A Different Tale

What comes to mind when one thinks of the music business? Perhaps a mental picture of music videos, compact discs, vinyl records, and recording studios are in the forefront…but is the quality of the music considered? Often people associate an artist’s productions with the image of the artist themselves based on what the consumer has seen of the musician on television. It is this association that is pushing the industry in a new direction that may not be a good progressive move. The music business is entering a new age where the popularity of music is becoming image-driven based on the artist instead of relying on the quality of the music itself.

When examining the problems associated with the new age in music, the institution of radio becomes an important issue. For as long as the current generation can remember, radio has always been present in the media scene—whether its popularity has maintained the homeostasis of its previous glory is another story—but still, it has stayed on the scene. Throughout the years for musicians, having one’s own song played on he airwaves was the ultimate goal, really; once they hit the radio, they would hit the “big time” simultaneously. It became the Mecca of the struggling singer-songwriter due to how many people could be reached within just three minutes in a radio slot. There were many obstacles though, such as getting one’s cassette tape or compact disc to the right person in authority, having connections to the right individuals, and having the monetary resources to back it all up. For example, the band Semisonic had to pay over $700,000 to get one of their singles on the radio. While independent artists do not have this wealth of money to hand over, there have been recent developments in the radio industry that will promote the smaller artists by having their own time slots. One has to ask, though…is it too little too late?

The downfall in radio listenership has not occurred overnight, but rather in a downhill slope over time. According to a study published on Business Insider.com, Kafka reports that radio listenership has dropped 7 and 8% in the course of only a month. This fall of radio is also affecting Wall Street, as the drops in popularity have far exceeded their predictions. In the area of Atlanta, one radio station in particular experienced a fall from grace and then a re-emergence. In 2008, 99X was removed from the airwaves due to poor levels of popularity and placed on the internet as online radio. After fifteen months of protest from the faithful traditional radio listeners, 99X was placed back on the air. This time around, though, they were handed the short end of the stick; placed at 97.9FM, the channel is very difficult to pick up on a radio. Only about two sections of the metro Atlanta area have been able to clearly pick up this new and non-improved frequency. Maybe this less than triumphant return is symbolic of the current position of radio, not just that of 99X.

You Think You Can Sing?

With the fall of radio, it must be acknowledged that the entertainment industry has not been left with an empty gap. A lessening of radio’s popularity has been succeeded by a strengthening in the popularity of television, maybe more prevalently in the rise of musical contestant shows such as American Idol and Don’t Forget the Lyrics. As most know, American Idol operates as a weekly elimination system where contestants perform often cringe-worthy covers of songs and are voted off based on their performances. This sounds like a fairly American activity, living the rise-to-success dream, right? Well…maybe not so much. It has become common knowledge that throughout the progression of this show that the votes are most often based on the physical attractiveness of the contestants in question. One needs to watch only a single episode of American Idol to gain this insight; from the get-go, it is very obvious who the favorites are based on their looks. What does this have to do with the music industry? It’s a simple correlation: the image emphasis projected by television spill over into the quality of the music produced in the industry. After a contestant wins American Idol, they are quickly thrown into a studio where they hastily record songs written by label executives that are intended to be chart-toppers and not much else. Even though the concept of musicians recording songs written by producers is not a new idea, the haste and rush associated with the show’s method of carrying the process out is even more disconnected and flimsy than usual. Even if the winning contestant is more than just a pretty face and actually possesses musical ability, their true voice is cut out of the equation due to their lack of involvement in the writing process of their own songs. This means that the music industry is met with an influx of second-rate songs devoid of true meaning or stories to tell. The artist becomes merely a middleman for the record companies’ success.

While Don’t Forget the Lyrics does not thrust musical hopefuls into the mainstream spotlight, it does bring to one’s attention just how far the music scene has fallen. The purpose of the show is for contestants to basically sing karaoke in front of America and to win money by not forgetting lyrics to the songs. Strangely enough, this set-up sounds notably similar to what happens at the dive bar down the street every Wednesday night, but those local contestants have enough dignity to slather their performances in alcohol so as to relieve the accountability for their actions. Don’t Forget the Lyrics is a thirty-minute cringe-fest that brings down one’s respect for music just a little bit more with each warbled note. One has to question whether or not this type of entertainment would have such a place in the media world if radio were still in its glory. Would there be a need to watch struggling amateurs as they tried to sound like passable vocalists? Most likely not, as new music would be premiering on the airwaves and there would be a higher standard for what should be considered listenable material.

Hope on the Horizon...or In the Sky

The new trend in an image-driven music industry can look bleak, if not hopeless, to those concerned about the fate of artists who may not be aesthetically pleasing, but have quality music. What happens if a musician has a “face made for radio” but is stuck in the realm of television and images? A hopeful frontier opening up for these individuals is that of the satellite radio system. In chapter seven of his book The Satellite Communications Handbook, Bruce Elbert shows that through satellite transmissions in space to units placed in cars, XM Satellite Radio is leading the way in a new kind of avenue for radio. The affordability of the satellite radio units would need to be altered to fit a wider audience, though, if they are to revive radio. At the present moment, the average family does not jump readily at the prospect of paying a steep monthly fee just for airwave transmissions in their car. However, if prices could be lowered, radio would be able to take back its place in the mainstream media and set a higher standard for music quality in the industry.

The image-driven music scene must find a new alternative, such as a revival of radio, in order to preserve the quality expectations that are necessary for the progression of music. Even though radio seems to be drawing its last breath, there is still hope for a new take on the scene that will offer artists a medium in which to express their music that is not shallow and solely based on looks. To keep up what should be a thriving and growing music arena, the focus must be removed from the image of the artist in question and shifted to the quality of their music.

Thursday, April 29, 2010

LOOK! IN THE SKY! IT'S---the future of radio?

It's not difficult to understand the downfall radio is experiencing in modern America. Very few people even utilize the radio anything besides a space filler on their dashboard. Is this the end of the line for what used to be the main way to premier new music?

In Bruce Elbert's book The Satellite Communication Applications Handbook, the author discusses the technicalities of XM Satellite Radio. He outlines the specifics of the program and its beginning stages when the satellites were first sent into space. Humorously enough, the two satellites are named "Rock" and "Roll"...well, I thought it was funny. The XM Satellite Radio service operates as a subscription program where users pay a monthly fee to gain access to the many music channels offered by the company.

For XM to replace the soon-to-be hole left by the demise of traditional radio, they are going to need an overhaul on their subscription fees. As the situation currently stands, most families are not inclined to pay the required amount of money in order to keep what is usually a free trial and installation of the satellite radio. A shift in XM's pricing will give more individuals the opportunity to engage in the new form of radio.

Monday, April 5, 2010

Viva la (concept of) Radio

When was the last time you actually listened to the radio? Not talk radio featuring your daily dose of angry old men spewing and spitting about things they can't change, but the actual radio with music? If you're like most Americans, you probably can't remember the last time you tuned in. Unfortunately for indie music artists, the positive developments in radio licensing fees will have little of the desired positive effect on them because of...well, because of your neglectful listening habits. But don't worry too much about it; there is a new frontier emerging for both indie and major label artists alike.
The television battlefield is quickly replacing what the radio has done for so long: artist promotion. The next time you watch t.v., pay attention to the commercials and count how many new artists are being featured in the background. Or, when you're watching Grey's Anatomy or CSI, listen at the end of the show and notice the fresh new music displayed. Luckily for new musicians on the scene, only one airing of a popular television show featuring their music or a single commercial can shoot them to the top of the charts with dizzying speed. Also, the fees for having one's music on television is much more affordable than the ridiculously steep price for radio airtime.
I think this shift from radio focus to television focus was imminent, but not really a doomsday kind of imminent, either. People will always have new mediums on which they place their attention, with television being the current one. Judging by the success new artists have enjoyed due to television placement, I would say that most everyone involved is benefitting.

Wednesday, March 24, 2010

Musicians needing real instruments? Pssh! That's sooo 2000 and late.

What do you think of when you hear the word "orchestra"? Like most people, you probably envision a group of people dressed in tuxedos and black dresses holding polished and expensive instruments, such as violins and cellos. Pretty standard, right? Well...maybe not for much longer. An article in Wired Magazine brings to light a new wave that is cresting in the music world.
For several years, modern musicians have used devices such as GarageBand, ProTools, and Sony Acid to technologically create and modify their music. It may not come as such a surprise then what Ge Wang is doing. He has assembled a "Mobile Phone Orchestra" where the members use an application on their iPhones to create unified music.
Wait...they're an orchestra without instruments???
Yep.
Personally, after listening to the YouTube clip provided on the article's webpage, I have no fears about the downfall of the traditional symphony experience. The flute application which Ge Wang uses as an example sounds entirely too much like a Sesame Street flute toy I had when I was five. To me, the music the Mobile Phone Orchestra has made so far is less than impressive. It may be signaling a trend, however, that will be honed and refined over the next few years to produce a good-sounding electronic orchestra experience.

Friday, March 12, 2010

Free samples might not be so free

What's your usual process of buying music? Most likely, you open up iTunes on your desktop and search for the artist you want, select the album, and double-click on a song to hear a 30-second sample of what you're about to purchase. The last part in this process has become kind of a second nature for music patrons, but recent developments in the online music business might eliminate the quick double-click option for a free sample.
In an article by columnist Greg Sandoval, the issue of songwriters and musicians not making enough money by regular online downloads alone is fleshed out. Those behind the music complain of making far too little money while those on the other side of the coin accuse their opponents of whining and to stop crying, basically.
I don't think there is a valid argument for songwriters to push their royalty-collecting onto song samples and the other music playing scenarios discussed in the article. Although they hold an important position in the production of all things entertainment, they are not God's chosen children who deserve more attention and pay than the rest of the struggling entertainment business. If they suck it up for a little longer, their pay influx is sure to improve, and they'll probably feel a tinge of regret for their present behavior of acting like bullied school children.

Monday, March 8, 2010

Stop complaining and do something!

In any given situation, there are two types of people: those who complain and those who choose to try and solve the problem. With the issue of overpaid musicians and celebrity figures, it is safe to say that basically all of us are the complainers. We are quick to criticize what we see but do not even consider the possibility of trying to improve the situation ourselves.
Here, Daily Nexus contributor Jason La presents the idea of changing our attitude towards the overpaid celebrities. He presents the problem and offers feasible alternatives to our normal behavior that will aid in turning around this situation regarding the outrageous financial gains of public figures.
Personally, I find La's perspective to be a refreshing one. Angry articles that vehemently blast Hollywood up one side and down the other are a dime a dozen, but very rarely is there a constructively critical take on the issue. La is also very balanced; his proposals are achievable, not "let's all hold hands and sing kumbaya under the oak trees while the bulldozer approaches". Hopefully, more people will latch onto this idea of balanced, positive action in regard to changing the way celebrity payroll is handled.

Monday, March 1, 2010

Overpaid Actors

This clip provided by ReelzChannel poses the issue of actors being paid more than what they technically should have received. The most overpaid actors are compiled into a list, with the issue of the numbers not connecting as a front and center point.